Livestock

Could Southern Plains Drought Shrink National Cattle Herd Again?

A lack of rainfall and a developing drought is raising caution flags for American cattlemen. The U.S. Drought Monitor shows 67 percent of the United States is in an abnormal drought. The majority of the dry conditions are lingering in the southern Plains, which is paired with weakening wheat and pasture conditions. In addition, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's monthly condition report shows Oklahoma's wheat fields are being impacted by the drought with 79 percent of the crop is rated poor to very poor. In Kansas, 14 percent is rated good to excellent. It's a considerable drop from a month ago, 44 percent of the Kansas wheat crop comes in at poor to very poor. Is it too early to worry a drought in the Plains will shrink the national herd? Could cattlemen see another massive drought like they saw in 2011 and 2012 when the national herd was forced to liquidize? AgDay national reporter Betsy Jibben looks into the issue with John Hofferth, chief operating officer with Pinal Feeding Company based in Maricopa, Arizona; Chris Hurt, agricultural economist with Purdue University; Chip Flory, Farm Journal economist and host of AgriTalk and AgriTalk After The Bell; Don Close, vice president of food and agribusiness research and animal protein at Rabo AgriFinance; and Derrell Peel, livestock marketing specialist at Oklahoma State University.
Read more...

Cargill Invests $4.2 Million In Beef Grinding Capacity At S.C. Plant

Popularity of ground beef continues to grow, and packers are responding to the increase in demand. Cargill Protein is investing $4.2 million at its Columbia, S.C. plant to expand beef grinding capabilities for consumers in the East Coast. The investment will adds new precision grinding equipment by May 2018 to increase plant production by 15%. Cargill purchased the Columbia facility in 2016 from FPL Food. At the time, Cargill said the 100,000-square-foot plant, employing more than 200 people, would help serve their eastern retail and food service customers. "This investment shows our commitment to the beef industry in the Eastern U.S. and allows us to deliver on the increasing needs of beef customers in the region, through the installation of higher performance production technologies," said John Keating, president, business operations and supply chain, Cargill Protein. In the past two years, Cargill says it has invested more than $850 million in their U.S. and Canada plants to meet the additional demands from consumers for more protein. This includes a $111 million cooked meats plant conversion in Nebraska, $27 million egg processing facility expansion in Michigan, $50 million distribution center at its Kansas beef plant, $146 million expansion of a cooked meats facility in Tennessee, and acquisitions of meat processing facilities in Texas, South Carolina and Tennessee.
Read more...

December Yields Record High Pork Production; Beef Up 4%

Additional packing capacity marked 2017 as a stand out year for hog producers. Large export and domestic demand also kept cattle supplies robustly current. Now, consumers are finally getting to take home the bacon and steaks, respectively. Pork production hit a record high in December, according to USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) Livestock Slaughter report, released Jan. 25. Pork production in December totaled 2.23 billion pounds, up 1% from December 2016. Hog slaughter totaled 10.5 million head, down slightly from December 2016. The average live weight was up 3 lb. from the previous year, at 286 lb. In total for the year, pork slaughter was up 3% from 2016, to 121 million head. Accumulated Beef Production Ends Year 4% Higher Beef production in December, at 2.15 billion pounds, was 1% below the previous year. Cattle slaughter totaled 2.58 million head, down 1% from December 2016. The average live weight was down 2 lb. from the previous year, at 1,379 lb. Veal production totaled 6.6 million pounds, 4% below December a year ago. Calf slaughter totaled 46,400 head, down 5% from December 2016. The average live weight was up 5 lb. from last year, at 245 lb. Lamb Production Lower Lamb and mutton production, at 12.8 million pounds, was down 2% from December 2016. Sheep slaughter totaled 188,100 head, 5% below last year. The average live weight was 136 lb., up 3 lb. from December a year ago. U.S. Read Meat Production Up U.S. commercial red meat production totaled 4.40 billion pounds in December, up slightly from the 4.40 billion pounds produced in December 2016. January to December 2017 commercial red meat production was 52.0 billion pounds, up 3% from 2016. Accumulated beef production was up 4% from last year, veal was down 1%, pork was up 3% from last year, and lamb and mutton production was down 3%.
Read more...

A Look at the Future of Pork Exports

The U.S. pork industry has enjoyed unprecedented export growth in the last five years: New markets show potential and traditional markets are strong because prices have been favorable. But the U.S. is producing more pork than ever before, which means exports are even more vital. Until recently, the industry had been on a "nice glide path," says Dermot Hayes, Distinguished Professor at Iowa State University. "The National Pork Producers Council and the U.S. trade representative were opening new markets almost every year. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) looked like it would increase our access to Japan and Vietnam, and that would have been big. "Now we're on this rocky road that causes concern," he says. "It's possible present policies could turn things around and cause exports to go back down." Under NAFTA, Mexico has been importing a surprisingly large quantity of U.S. pork"”up to 10% of U.S. production"”and it seems every year it goes up by another 10%, Hayes says. "For me, that was a puzzle, so I've been doing applied research. It turns out the Mexican economy was centered on beef because beef was what they had, but pork has become much more affordable. "Mexican citizens are changing their diets, their recipes and their restaurants from a beef-based diet to a pork-based diet," Hayes says. "That period of six or seven years of extremely high beef prices really had a negative impact on beef consumption in price-conscious countries like Mexico, Columbia, Peru and Argentina. Beef was scarce for a long enough time that consumers developed an appreciation and a taste for pork." With Mexico wanting U.S. pork more than ever, an unresolved NAFTA would be devastating for producers, because the industry would potentially need to downsize, Hayes says. "That's miserable, because the only way to get an industry smaller is to induce losses and that's a major concern right now," he says. He hopes the outlook will improve with a renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement and other bilateral agreements. "When I look at the map, we have free trade agreements with Australia, South Korea, Columbia (which is growing like crazy), Peru, Central America, Mexico and Canada. Where the economics have been allowed to work, we've seen U.S. pork exports increase," Hayes says.
Read more...

Canada's Beef Checkoff Set to More Than Double to $2.50

By the end of 2018 all cattle producers in Canada will pay a national C$2.50 beef checkoff per animal sold. Previously the Canadian Beef Cattle Checkoff was C$1 per animal marketed and it had been at that pricing since 2002. Similar to the beef checkoff in the U.S., funding goes towards research and marketing of beef. Currently, the national beef checkoff in Canada generates an estimated C$7.5 million (US$6.04 million) annually. The increase to C$2.50 would bring the annual checkoff revenue to C$18.75 (US$15.09 million). The increase to the beef checkoff in Canada was set in motion in 2014 when a document called the National Beef Strategy was developed by beef industry leaders from various organizations. "It lays out a collaborative business plan to use combinations of research, marketing and promotion, policy development and stakeholder engagement to increase production efficiencies, reduce cost disadvantages compared to main competitors, increase carcass cutout values, enhance synergies within industry and connect positively with consumers, the public, government, and partner industries," writes Bryan Thiessen, Chair of the Beef Cattle Research Council and manager of Namaka Farms near Strathmore, Alberta. With fewer cattle and inflation, Canadian cattle producers recognized a change was needed to help fund need research and marketing that will help get beef to consumers around the globe. "As an industry, we have a responsibility to help pay for the beef research and extension that benefit us and to work more closely with government to ensure priority research is invested in. There's also a broader range of research needed now because fewer and fewer people have connections to the farm and therefore the public has little understanding about agriculture," Thiessen says. Some provinces have already started taking in the $2.50 national checkoff. This past fall both eastern provinces Prince Edward Island and Nova Scotia began taking in funding. The remaining provinces plan to start collecting the increased checkoff amount in 2018. For instance, Alberta producers will begin paying the additional amount in April. Increasing the beef checkoff has been a debated topic in the U.S. for several years with many individual states holding referendums to increase their local checkoff. Oklahoma recently had a vote that failed, while Iowa and Ohio had successful referendums in the past few years. The U.S. still only has a US$1 beef checkoff per head assessment nationally. Annually the U.S. beef checkoff brings in US$72 million for research and marketing. Canada's increase to C$2.50 per head in national checkoff is a drop in the bucket compared to the total checkoff assessment some producers pay when adding in their local provinces fee. For instance, in Quebec cattle producers pay an additional C$10.49 per cull cow, and less for younger cattle. Manitoba and Ontario pay C$3 per head for the province fee. (Note: $1 U.S. Dollar equals $1.24 Canadian Dollar. The national Canadian beef checkoff would equate to US$2.01.)
Read more...

Disaster Bill Could Make Passing the Farm Bill Easier

Round one of the farm bill battles could be settled as soon as this month if the Senate agrees on a fix for cotton and dairy in the $81 billion disaster aid bill already passed by the House. Not only would a cotton and dairy plan settle one of the most contentious negotiations of a new farm bill, it would also increase the baseline funding available for the new five-year bill. ProFarmer Washington policy analyst Jim Wiesemeyer says that would make finishing the Farm Bill "easier, but not easy." The $81 billion disaster aid package contains a provision that would make cotton growers eligible for a commodity price support program under Title 1 of the Farm Bill. In addition, the language makes growers eligible for the Price Loss Coverage (PLC) program and removes the $20 million cap on the Livestock Gross Margin program for dairy. "If they get the [safety net] changes in the disaster bill, they get a funding baseline right away," Wiesemeyer explains. "Then that will carry over when they start the Farm Bill debate. They won't have to find as much money." Sen. Jerry Moran (R-KS) says the bill will reduce fighting among different sectors of agriculture by increasing the amount of money available to fund the Farm Bill. "While the spending amounts will still be challenging it means there will be less of trying to take money out of one thing that's important to agriculture to pay for something else that's important to agriculture," he says. Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) says the House bill missed an important opportunity to repair "the broken dairy safety net." "Expanding insurance options for dairy farmers is a good first step - but there's more we can do to help our producers recover from tough economic times and lay the groundwork for further progress in the 2018 Farm Bill," she said in a statement. "As the Senate completes its work on the disaster package, I will continue to support the Margin Protection Program improvements that Senators Cochran and Leahy made in the Senate Agriculture Appropriations Bill." During his address to the American Farm Bureau Federation national convention attendees, President Trump said he was "looking forward to working with Congress to pass the farm bill on time, so that it delivers for all of you." Only time will tell if Congress is in fact able to pass a new Farm Bill in 2018.
Read more...

Billion Dollar Disasters Hammered Farm Country Last Year

Two years ago, Andle van der Ploeg, owner of Mid-Frisian Dairy near Clovis, N.M., experienced the worst blizzard of his life. The freak storm, named Goliath, hit on Dec. 28, 2015, and resulted in tens of thousands of dead cows in the region. Van der Ploeg says storms like Goliath teach you something: resiliency. What a year 2017 has been for learning that lesson. From delayed planting due to snow in parts of the Corn Belt, to wind, rain, hurricanes and fire's fury in other areas, the resiliency of farm country was tested this year. Severe weather woes started early as dozens of tornadoes hit the southeast in January, including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana and Mississippi. Tornadoes accounted for seven billion-dollar weather events in 2017, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National Centers for Environmental Information. February brought floods. California suffered extreme flooding as much-needed rain caused the Feather River to flow beyond its banks. More than 382,000 acres of farmland and fields in the Sacramento Valley were submerged, some for several months. In March, a late frost preceded by weeks of warm weather damaged fruit and vegetable crops in the southeast. According to Georgia Agriculture Commissioner Gary Black, farmers took a $300 million hit from the loss of peaches and blueberries alone. One other flooding event made NOAA's list of billion-dollar disasters. In late April and early May, a series of storms in Missouri and Arkansas halted planting as more than 11" of rain fell. At the same time, winter storm Ursa dropped heavy snow in the Plains. Parts of Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Texas saw blizzard conditions with 9" to 18" of snow. Severe drought also took its toll. NOAA estimates the ongoing drought in Montana and the Dakotas has resulted in roughly $2 billion in damages. Fueled by the lack of rain, fire's fury swept across Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas. Thousands of cattle died and were displaced, and the fires left billions of dollars of damaged grassland, hay and wheat fields in their wake. Later, another round of wildfires roared through Montana and California, wiping out wineries and cannabis farms in Sonoma County. Hurricanes Harvey and Irma also left their mark on U.S. agriculture. Harvey made landfall in Texas in late August just as corn, cotton and rice harvest was wrapping up. The South Texas Cotton and Grain Association reports the final tally on crop losses could reach $150 million. Cotton farmers in the Upper Coastal Bend were some of the hardest-hit, according to the Texas Department of Agriculture. There, hundreds of cotton modules were blown apart by gale-force winds and many more were left lying wet in fields and at gin yards. Fortunately, Texas rice producers had already harvested around 75% of the crop before the storm hit, but storage bins suffered extensive wind and water damage resulting in additional crop loss. Hurricane Irma took a toll on fruit and vegetable crops. "We had a lot of specialty peppers, eggplants and tomatoes in the ground, and we had just planted some summer squash," recalls Steve Veneziano, vice president of sales and operations at Oakes Farms Inc., Naples, Fla. Those crops were lost. Dairies in Florida also suffered damage. On H.C. Dairy Farm in Lakeside, east of Tampa, a freestall barn collapsed and took rescue crews several days to get 400-plus milk cows out of the rubble. Jerry Dakin, owner of Dakin Dairy Farms, says most of their milk goes to the southern part of the state where many stores had no power. Many area farms were forced to dump milk because trucks didn't show up to take it. Dakin estimates the losses ran $30,000 per day from dumping milk. At the very tale-end of the year, wildfire engulfed much of California. "A historic firestorm damages or destroys over 15,000 homes, businesses and other structures across California in October," NOAA reported in their January 2018 update of the disaster list. "The combined destruction of the Tubbs, Atlas, Nuns and Redwood Valley wildfires represent the most costly wildfire event on record, also causing 44 deaths. Extreme wildfire conditions in early December also burned hundreds of homes in Los Angeles." Webster defines resiliency as the capacity to recover quickly from difficulties, and farmers possess that quality in spades. The road to recovery for many will not be a quick one, but there's no doubt U.S. farmers and ranchers are up to the task. Weather events across the U.S. this year did more than $15 billion worth of damage to crops, livestock and farm property, according to NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information.
Read more...

November Pork Exports Set New Value Record; Beef Exports Also Strong

U.S. pork exports recorded the highest-ever monthly value in November while U.S. beef export value took another step toward a likely full-year value record, according to export results released by USDA and compiled by the U.S. Meat Export Federation (USMEF). November pork exports totaled 223,962 metric tons (mt), down slightly from a year ago. But through the first 11 months of 2017, export volume remained on pace for a new record at 2.23 million mt, up 7 percent year-over-year. November export value was a record-high $615.6 million, up 5 percent year-over-year and just the fourth time monthly export value has topped $600 million. Through November, pork export value increased 10 percent to $5.9 billion. Exports accounted for 27.7 percent of total pork production in November (down slightly from November 2016) and 24.1 percent for muscle cuts only (up about one percentage point). For January through November, these ratios increased about one percentage point from a year ago to 26.5 percent of total production and 22.2 percent for muscle cuts. November pork export value averaged $58.38 per head slaughtered, up 6 percent from a year ago and the highest in six months. Through the first 11 months of the year, per-head export value averaged $53.18, up 7 percent. Beef exports reached 111,915 mt in November, down 3 percent from the large volume of November 2016 but still the second-highest monthly total of the year. Export value was also the second-largest of 2017 at $666.4 million, up 8 percent year-over-year. January-November export volume totaled 1.15 million mt, up 7 percent, while export value climbed to $6.6 billion, up 15 percent from a year ago and slightly above the record pace established in 2014. Beef exports accounted for 13.1 percent of total production in November, the highest since July but down from 14.9 percent in November 2016. For muscle cuts only, the percentage exported was 10.9 percent, down from 11.7 percent a year ago. For January through November, beef exports accounted for 12.8 percent of total production (down from 13.5 percent in 2016) and 10.3 percent for muscle cuts (steady with 2016). November beef export value averaged $306.63 per head of fed slaughter, up 4 percent from a year ago and the highest in nearly three years. January-November export value averaged $282.34 per head, up 9 percent. Pork variety meat exports top $1 billion, breaking previous full-year record. Although pork variety meat exports slowed in November, the 11-month total of 498,661 mt was still 6 percent higher year-over-year. Export value climbed 19 percent to $1.06 billion, setting a full-year record and exceeding $1 billion for the first time. "For all livestock producers, variety meat exports make a very important contribution to carcass value," explained USMEF President and CEO Dan Halstrom. "USMEF has made it a priority to help our international customers develop more uses for pork variety meat and to broaden the global market for these products. At a time of record-large pork production, it is especially gratifying to see variety meat export value jump nearly 20 percent, which boosts the bottom line for everyone in the supply chain." Other January-November highlights for U.S. pork exports include: In South Korea, where most U.S. pork now enters the market duty-free under the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS), strong November growth pushed January-November volume up 28 percent year-over-year to 153,569 mt, valued at $420 million, up 30 percent. Pork exports to Mexico moderated slightly in November but remain poised for a sixth consecutive volume record in 2017. Through November, volume was up 12 percent from a year ago to 726,717 mt, while export value increased 15 percent to $1.37 billion. Mexico is a critically important destination for U.S. hams, especially with the current high level of U.S. hog production. In Australia, which is also a leading market for U.S. hams, November exports climbed 29 percent from a year ago in volume (6,393 mt) and 23 percent in value to $18.4 million. Through November, exports totaled 62,675 mt (up 9 percent) valued at $183.8 million (up 14 percent). Exports to leading value market Japan posted a strong November performance, increasing 4 percent in volume (38,979 mt) and 7 percent in value ($164.5 million) from a year ago. This pushed Japan's 11-month totals up 1 percent (to 361,401 mt) and 4 percent (to $1.49 billion), respectively. Chilled pork export volume to Japan was steady at 200,856 mt, while value increased 4 percent to $949 million. November pork exports to South America edged higher year-over-year in both volume and value, as the region continued to build on the full-year records already achieved in October. January-November exports to South America were up 64 percent from a year ago in both volume (96,763 mt) and value ($248.9 million). Regional growth has been driven by record-large exports to leading market Colombia, while exports to Chile and Peru have also set full-year records. Exports to Central America and the Dominican Republic are also on a record pace in 2017. Led by strong growth in mainstay markets Honduras and Guatemala, January-November exports to Central America were up 5 percent year-over-year in volume (65,056 mt) and 8 percent in value ($158.5 million). Export volume to the Dominican Republic climbed 24 percent to 28,836 mt, while value increased 31 percent to $66.2 million. Pork exports to China/Hong Kong trended lower in 2017, reflecting an increase in China's domestic pork production, though muscle cut shipments regained some momentum beginning in October, ahead of Chinese New Year. Through November, exports to the region dropped 9 percent year-over-year in volume to 454,816 mt, but value dipped just 1 percent to $973.9 million. China/Hong Kong is the leading contributor to the aforementioned pork variety meat value record, as January-November variety meat exports increased 4 percent in volume (293,756) while value soared 17 percent to $667.6 million. Pork variety meat export value to China/Hong Kong equated to $6 for every hog harvested from January through November. Japan, Hong Kong drive beef export growth; new value records in Korea and Taiwan Japan continued to be the pacesetter for U.S. beef exports in November, with volume increasing 5 percent year-over-year to 24,819 mt and value up 6 percent to $159.2 million. This pushed Japan's 11-month totals to 285,336 mt (up 20 percent) valued at $1.75 billion (up 27 percent and a new post-BSE record). Chilled beef exports reached 137,707 mt through November, up 35 percent, valued at a record-high $1.02 billion, up 39 percent. Approaching Chinese New Year, beef exports to Hong Kong gained momentum in October and climbed again in November, with volume up 20 percent from a year ago to 16,106 mt (the largest since December 2014) and value soaring 43 percent to $119 million. Through November, exports to Hong Kong climbed 13 percent in volume (113,440 mt) and 26 percent in value ($765 million). November exports to China were 655 mt, the largest since the mid-June market opening, valued at $5.7 million. Through November, exports reached 2,225 mt valued at $22.8 million. "U.S. beef has only really scratched the surface in China, so exports are still relatively small but the value per pound is among the highest in the world," Halstrom said. "This makes China an exciting addition to our strong portfolio of Asian markets, where beef exports continue to expand at an impressive rate. 2017 was a tremendous year for U.S. beef in Asia, and the coming year looks very promising as well." Other January-November highlights for U.S. beef exports include: Driven by strong retail demand and reduced tariffs under KORUS, beef exports to South Korea have already set a new value record. Through November, exports increased 5 percent year-over-year in volume to 167,532 mt, valued at $1.1 billion, up 19 percent from a year ago and edging past the 2016 record of $1.06 billion. Chilled beef exports to Korea accelerated at an even faster rate, jumping 88 percent in volume to a record 41,086 mt, valued at $368.5 million, up 93 percent. A new value record was also established in Taiwan, where U.S. beef holds more than 70 percent of the chilled beef market. Through November, exports to Taiwan increased 3 percent from a year ago in volume (40,402 mt) while value climbed 16 percent to $369.9 million, breaking the 2016 record of $362.8 million. November beef exports to Mexico dipped 8 percent in volume from a year ago to 20,161 mt, but value increased 2 percent to $80.8 million. Through November, exports to Mexico were steady with the first 11 months of 2016 in both volume (216,765 mt) and value ($894.1 million). Mexico is the second-largest volume market for U.S. beef (behind Japan) and ranks third in value (after Japan and Korea). Strong year-over-year growth in Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam pushed January-November exports to the ASEAN region to 38,039 mt (up 46 percent year-over-year), valued at $193.3 million (up 39 percent). Led by Chile, Peru and Colombia, beef exports to South America have already set new annual records. Through November, exports increased 27 percent from a year ago in volume (26,786 mt) and 23 percent in value ($106 million). Since shipments began in April, exports to Brazil have shown solid potential, reaching 1,998 mt valued at $7 million. November lamb exports struggle, but value still higher year-over-year U.S. lamb exports were 520 mt in November, down 36 percent from a year ago and the lowest since April, while export value fell 11.5 percent to $1.75 million. For muscle cuts only, November volume was down 12 percent to 284 mt but value increased 2 percent to $1.51 million. Through November, lamb exports dropped 16 percent from a year ago in volume (6,659 mt) but increased 6 percent in value to $17.8 million. Muscle cuts exports moved higher year-over-year in both volume (2,197 mt, up 10 percent) and value ($12.89 million, up 18 percent). Despite an unusually severe hurricane season, muscle cut exports to the Caribbean increased 12 percent in volume (596 mt) and 37 percent in value ($4.84 million). NOTES: Export statistics refer to both muscle cuts and variety meat, unless otherwise noted. One metric ton (mt) = 2,204.622 pounds
Read more...

NAFTA Talks Hit Rough Patch

With talks slowed by discord and tough demands by the U.S., the hope for a quick finish to a redo of the North American Free Trade Agreement was gone after talks in Washington, D.C. A joint statement by the U.S., Mexico and Canada in mid-October said new proposals have created "challenges" and "significant conceptual gaps." Mexico will host the next round, the fifth round of talks, in Mexico City Nov. 17-21. Additional rounds will be scheduled through the first quarter of 2018, according to the statement. There was some media speculation that President Donald Trump might scrap NAFTA all together if the U.S. demands aren't met. U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said in a statement Oct. 17 that Canada and Mexico have not been receptive to U.S. proposals that would reduce U.S. trade deficits. "Frankly, I am surprised and disappointed by the resistance to change from our negotiating partners," Lighthizer said in a statement. "As difficult as this has been, we have seen no indication that our partners are willing to make any changes that will result in a re-balancing and a reduction in these huge trade deficits." Produce has become a big story line in the NAFTA talks, and the Chicago Tribune ran a story Oct. 17 headlined "How a group of Florida tomato growers could help derail NAFTA" describing the efforts by Florida growers and others to put a new trade remedy tool for seasonal perishable producers in the updated NAFTA - a proposal that Mexican negotiators said sink any agreement. Mike Stuart, president of the Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association, said in an e-mail that Lighthizer confirmed in his press conference Oct. 17 that the seasonal and perishable provision has been formally put forward by the U.S. in the trade talks. "We continue to be highly supportive of this proposal and are greatly appreciative to the administration for their strong leadership on this important issue," Stuart said. "It's important to recognize that, in pursuing this proposal, the administration is addressing specific direction from Congress under the Trade Promotion Authority Act that any agreement should seek to eliminate practices that adversely affect trade in perishable or cyclical products, while improving import relief mechanisms to recognize the unique characteristics of perishable and cyclical agriculture." The proposal has met fierce resistance from Mexico. Bosco de la Vega, president of the National Agricultural Council, told the Chicago Tribune the proposal was a "red line" and against the interests of free trade. Exporters of apples, pears, pork and other commodities are concerned the trade remedy, if included in NAFTA, could be used against their exports to Mexico.
Read more...

2018 Outlook: Beef Demand vs. Growing Cattle Supplies

Demand has proven the key to holding livestock markets in the black during 2017. Despite increasing beef production, cattle feeders experienced a booming market last spring that padded closeouts at times in excess of $400 per head. Demand, industry analysts say, was the driving force that kept pulling cattle forward and in the process a steep decline in carcass weights. That windfall for feed yards fueled the desire for replacement cattle, supporting prices for feeder cattle and calves at unanticipated levels. “Strong demand for beef kept pulling cattle forward, and feedyards had the incentive to bid up replacements,” says Sterling Marketing president John Nalvika. “That put a lot of dollars in ranchers pockets for feeder cattle that we didn’t think would be there at the beginning of the year.” Now the question on rancher’s minds is, “Can demand continue to support the growing supplies?” The short answer is, “Yes, but probably not without a modest decline in prices.” Price risk is always possible, but analysts say risk and volatility is reduced at this point in the cattle cycle. That’s because prices are well below the peaks of a couple years ago, and market fundamentals have replaced much of the market’s emotion. Generally, analysts expect 2018 cattle prices will be somewhat lower on an average basis than in 2017. That’s due to further increases in supply of beef and all proteins. “In four short years, we’ve seen total red meat and poultry supplies increase 10%, recovering from the drought-fueled low set in 2014,” Nalivka says. He projects per capita red meat and poultry supplies will near 222 pounds in 2018, or 20 pounds more than the low of 202 pounds in 2014. Specifically to beef, feeder cattle numbers will be up for the third consecutive year, on-feed numbers will increase and total beef production is projected to jump another 4% in 2018 to record highs. “We are still in the stage of the cattle cycle where supplies are going to get larger for another two or three years,” CattleFax CEO Randy Blach told cattlemen at the National Angus Convention. But, he noted, the cattle industry has navigated those hurdles well. “We’ve got everything going our way - exports are better than anticipated, domestic demand has been good, consumer spending and consumer attitudes have all been very positive - but it doesn’t take much and we could start to move back the other way.” Blach told attendees at the Kansas Livestock Association convention that increasing domestic household income and growing consumer confidence has led to the highest-quality beef supply in decades. “The Prime-Choice spread has stayed at very large levels despite the increase in supply,” he said. “That’s demand. That’s the market telling us they want more of the good stuff.” Although the demand picture is positive, Blach said feeder cattle prices will stay flat, ranging from $135 to $160/cwt in 2018. He anticipates modest, yet solid profit margins in the calf market. Maintaining a strong export market for beef will be critical for domestic prices in 2018. “Demand surpassed expectations in 2017,” Nalivka says. “Retail beef prices in 2017 were 10 cents cheaper while per capita consumption was increasing 1.5 pounds. That’s excellent demand.” And a 12% gain in U.S. beef exports in 2017 shows robust demand, especially following a 13% gain in 2016. “Exports amounted to 11% of production in 2017,” Nalivka says. “I project we’ll see another 4% gain in exports in 2018, which will be record high. It would mean we’re exporting 3 billion pounds of mostly high-value beef.”
Read more...